◌ Demo data
MR
  1. Brand Graph
  2. → Intent
  3. → Ingest
  4. → Reader Lens
  5. → Evidence Check
  6. → Precedents
  7. → Fix & Route
  8. → Approval
  9. → Proof Card

Case law

Past reviewer decisions, matched to new findings by similarity. Precedents inform reviewers; they never approve content automatically.

◌ Demo data
Conflict detected: P-097 (Allowed) and P-118 (Rejected) reach opposite decisions on near-identical absolute claims under R-012. A human reviewer should resolve this and record a superseding precedent.

P-118 detail

✕ Rejected▲ In conflict

Unbreakable detection for every endpoint

Rule
R-012 No absolute security claims
Date
2026-09-14
Reviewer
M. Okafor
Similarity
0.93 ◌ Demo data

Rationale

Absolute wording cannot be substantiated by the benchmark (A-02).